[1] < [3] [4] 5 > [8] |
遠啲呢啲Durham區就係啲屋平啲嘅, 耶穌就係呢種人喇 | |
所以其實耶穌自己認唔夠斤兩, 都幾謙喎 | |
都有火辣susanna架 | |
| |
咁耶穌住納匝肋區, 山旭旯平區嚟, | |
| |
你又再要洋鬼子【寄生虫】指教你中文 好:怒火:寄生虫, 就指教你个基督正化閪:大腳踢: 山旮旯 山 旮 旯 | |
旭辉之旭旭日初升 之 旭 屌你 | |
嗰度係佢嘅office | |
但係劇本一貫吹噓耶穌幾咁popular, 咁同要召病人嘅醫生仔, 在劇情的consistency方面就有點甩轆 | |
回覆 68# 沙文 1. 癈話,混淆比喻及實況,你到底明唔明咩叫比喻?你才疏學淺我可以再教你一次。 2. 咁就麻煩你證實吓所有以前大肚冇睇過醫生都有事,因為你話係need吖嘛。 3. 都係同2一樣,整唔整形,係want,唔係need。咁你一開始話胸唔夠大,我就概括去整形。問返你,第一個有記載嘅成功整胸手術係幾時? 4. 入醫委會、醫生俱樂部都要醫生。不過同2一樣,你都係混淆need 同want囉。 | |
2 所有以前女人大肚都係高risk架啦,有睇醫生risk就低尐,問你老母就清楚尐,若果有揀邊個生仔唔想母子平安嘅機會高尐?唔通你老母唔係咁諗? 3唔知問黎做乜L嘢 4want同need會互相交叉發生,例如,i want to believe就會發展成i need to beleve. 如果你need to believe 就會want to believe. 你信耶穌係want 定need P.S.你從善如流, 冇咁長氣, 特此鳴謝 | |
4want同need會互相交叉發生,例如,i want to believe就會發展成i need to beleve. 如果你need to believe 就會want to believe. 你信耶穌係want 定need want 與 need 有唔同既 例如: you want susanna to have sex 唔等如 you need susanna to have sex 一want 就要need....就有啲貪婪, 邪邪哋 | |
You want to have sex with susanna You need to have sex with susanna | |
呢個係天主教立場啫. 要計乜乜期唔准用蔣介石之劍, 呀jim唔同你咁講嘅 | |
好似有啲唔妥喎, 你意思係咪: 咁又係, 當susanna has sex 時, 不一定要同「you」,, 同 「him」都得 | |
| |
1. "為本"唔代表可以混淆或混用。 2. 咁即係唔係need,又證明唔到睇左係remove risk啦 3. 即係你證明唔到你起初嘅3咩胸唔夠大係可以套用喺AD33啦。 4. want 係 want, need 係 need,兩者定義根本就不同,你學DIOR混淆字義啲咁低莊嘅手段,係無助真正嘅討論。 | |
2.咁即係need,又證明到睇左係reduced risk, 能夠減低風險, 就係need 3.波唔夠大係一個example, 眼皮唔夠雙都係同樣道理 4. 定義根本就不同但係就會交替發生, 我冇學過DIOR任何嘢。你話畀大家聽你信耶穌係need定want就有助真正嘅討論 | |
1. 癈話 2. 斬腳都可以reduce沙蟲嘅risk,you need? 3. 咁你揾唔揾到第一個雙眼皮手術成功年份? 4. 定義不同就不同,出世根本唔係一定要睇醫生,咩交唔交根本係癈話。 己盡顯你為左反駁要潑皮撒賴嘅功力,請繼續 |
[1] < [3] [4] 5 > [8] |