| [1] < [2] [3] 4 > [6] |
| |
Besides the point above, the decision maker can also have different attitude. The Pascal wager assumes a Bayes decision maker. The decision maker will always take a choice with the highest expected return. In real life, people also consider risk. People also consider the worst case scenario with the best case scenario. Some are reward-driven, other focus on loss-avoidance, for example. | |
在信有神, 信無神問題上 不可知論=神存在或神不存在 有神論=神存在 無神論=神不存在 不可知論比有神論或無神論對的機會都更高，錯的機會都更少。 | |
回復 beebeechan 問得好丫 那為甚麼這班貪生怕死的謂門徒, 在幾十日後卻變得膽粗粗, 唔怕死, 公然在聖殿講耶穌呢? 跟之前的行為大大不同了, 由死埋一邊變了行在前頭, 突哂頭 之間發生了何事呢? | |
"不可知論=神存在或神不存在 有神論=神存在 無神論=神不存在 不可知論比有神論或無神論對的機會都更高。" by ananlogy 不可知論=The earth shape is unknown Flat earth 論=The earth is flat Round earth 論= The earth is round Can you conclude that the 不可知論 has a higher probability than round earth theory? Can you see the err in logic? ------------------------- 不可知論 is ALWAYS wrong. You can never be right in 不可知論! It is an approach to problem (by not answering the question) but not an answer in itself to the question. Both athiest and theist face the question but agnotic avoid the question altogather. (But, can you really avoid it?) | |
Simple. You can make anything happen in a work of fiction. | |
| |
已經閹左嘛 ,米唔怕捧打出頭鳥囉 | |
回復 beebeechan Well, the Bible sure is a great fiction. A group of people is told to write a story. You do not know what I will write and I do not know what you will write. He does not know what we are about to write. We write at different places and different time and yet, we come up to the same story. What is the probability of things coming up this way? | |
Secondly, if you have a council to decide on whoch book, the probabilty is high. | |
| |
Firstly, they do know. The gospels were already out there when the bible was canonized. The church did not write the bible. | |
Firstly, they do know. know what? | |
回復 beebeechan 你在本版是幾時受閹的? (而且閹得幾深下囉) | |
咁都唔及你咁閹完玥閹再返閹呀 | |
回復 beebeechan 你諗唔到點回, 不如不回哩 回得太廢了 | |
But you only have one newspaper, the Bible. And it is known to lie through the teeth before. | |
回復 72# beebeechan The second problem of this is that it only shows what the reporters believe to have happen. It is not definitive of what actually happen (or fact). How trustworthy depends on the skills and knowledge of the reporters involved. Bible's reporters (which they CLAIM to have many without proof) are known to be biased, have a vest interest (and they admit it), and they are uneducated in today's standard. | |
The church did not write the bible. beebeechan 但係教會都一定會搵一d favour 佢地既譯本. 可能正如另一個 thread 講聖經內根本無 church. 所以你都可以創教的. ... 而事實上都有很多人咁做.. -- Bible's reporters (which they CLAIM to have many without proof) are known to be biased, have a vest interest (and they admit it), and they are uneducated in today's standard. i agree | |
但係教會都一定會搵一d favour 佢地既譯本. 可能正如另一個 thread 講聖經內根本無 church. 所以你都可以創教的. ... 而事實上都有很多人咁做.. 你今日收錄一套香港粵語流行歌集, 你一定要收錄許冠傑的半斤八兩, 鐵塔凌雲, 雙星情歌...等等. 因為他們早已在民間流傳已久. 教會在397年迦太基會議相討聖經成典, 也會收錄各路加福音, 瑪竇福音, 若望福音, 馬爾谷福音, 保祿 書信....等等 因為它們也是早在民間流傳了三百多年。 |
| [1] < [2] [3] 4 > [6] |
