精神科藥物的可靠性，也不比宇宙大爆炸可靠。 | |
Rank most reliable to least reliable of the following scientific disciplines 1) Quantum Mechanics 2) Atomic and Molecular Physics 3) Molecular Biology 4) Evolutionary Biology and History of Life 5) Astronomy (Knowledge within solar system) 6) Astronomy (Knowledge outside solar system but within milky say) 7) Cosmology (Knowledge outside Milky Way but excluding history of universe and big bang) 8) Cosmology (History of universe and big bang) 9) Geology (Knowledge of Earth inner core and outer core) 10) Cosmology (existence of alien or extraterrestrial life) 11) Quantum Physics (String Theory and Theory of Everything) 12) Multiverse Hypothesis 13) Multiple Dimension (5 spacetime dimension or higher) 14) Existence of God and God Creation 15) Existence of Afterlife (including past life regression , near death experience, religious experience, spiritual experience, and reincarnation research) 16) Successful of Cryonics and Cryopreservation revival 17) Possible Achieve Biological Immortality by future technology 18) Medical Science and medicine benefit outweigh side effect 19) Mental Science and Mental drugs benefit outweigh side effect 20) Social Science (especially in politics research) | |
1. **Atomic and Molecular Physics**: This field is based on a large body of empirical evidence and a strong scientific consensus. 2. **Quantum Mechanics**: Quantum mechanics is well-established and supported by extensive experimental results, but some aspects are still subject to interpretation. 3. **Molecular Biology**: This field is supported by extensive empirical evidence, provides clear and testable predictions, and is fundamental to many aspects of biology and medicine. 4. **Medical Science and medicine benefit outweigh side effect**: Medical sciences are highly reliable, with rigorous testing methods (like randomized controlled trials) to establish the efficacy and safety of treatments. 5. **Evolutionary Biology and History of Life**: Evolution is a well-established field with broad empirical support, although debates continue over certain details and mechanisms. 6. **Astronomy (Knowledge within solar system)**: Our understanding of our own solar system is detailed and largely based on direct observations and space missions. 7. **Geology (Knowledge of Earth inner core and outer core)**: Knowledge about Earth's core is inferred from seismic wave data, leading to a reasonable degree of certainty. 8. **Astronomy (Knowledge outside the solar system but within Milky Way)**: Observations become less direct and more subject to interpretation as we move beyond our solar system but still within our galaxy. 9. **Cosmology (Knowledge outside Milky Way but excluding history of universe and big bang)**: As we move beyond our galaxy, observations become less direct and more subject to interpretation. 10. **Cosmology (History of universe and big bang)**: The Big Bang theory is the prevailing model for the early universe, but it involves extrapolating present theories to extreme conditions. 11. **Mental Science and Mental drugs benefit outweigh side effect**: The benefits of mental health treatments can be significant, but individual responses can vary, and side effects can be substantial. 12. **Cosmology (existence of alien or extraterrestrial life)**: The existence of alien life remains a hypothesis with no direct evidence, though many scientists consider it plausible due to the vast number of exoplanets. 13. **Possible Achieve Biological Immortality by future technology**: While significant progress has been made in understanding aging, achieving biological immortality remains speculative and faces many scientific and ethical challenges. 14. **Quantum Physics (String Theory and Theory of Everything)**: These are currently speculative theories with no direct experimental confirmation, even though they might resolve significant theoretical issues. 15. **Multiple Dimension (5 spacetime dimension or higher)**: Extra-dimensional theories, such as string theory, are unconfirmed and largely speculative. 16. **Successful of Cryonics and Cryopreservation revival**: The current state of cryonics is such that we can freeze organisms, but the revival of complex organisms after cryopreservation still remains unproven. 17. **Multiverse Hypothesis**: This is a highly speculative concept that currently exceeds our ability to test directly, although some versions of the multiverse hypothesis are considered plausible within certain theoretical frameworks. 18. **Social Science (especially in politics research)**: The complexity and variability of human behavior, as well as the influence of numerous confounding factors, introduce a level of uncertainty. 19. **Existence of God and God Creation**: These topics largely fall under the domain of theology and philosophy rather than science, as they don't provide testable hypotheses. They often invoke arguments from cosmology and physics. 20. **Existence of Afterlife (including past life regression, near death experience, religious experience, spiritual experience, and reincarnation research)**: These topics often fall into the realm of parapsychology, which is often not recognized as a mainstream scientific discipline due to lack of rigorous methodology, reproducibility, and consensus. This ranking is a simplification and doesn't reflect the importance or validity of each discipline or hypothesis. All are part of the broader human endeavor to understand the universe and our place in it. Furthermore, the state of knowledge and consensus can change as new evidence or theories emerge. The last few items in particular reflect areas that are often considered outside the domain of science, as they involve concepts that are currently untestable or subjective in nature. | |
| |
問 ChatGPT 寄生虫 话 基督教 最 不可靠 | |
ai chat反省時要問: 'urrr... 我曾答了政治研究比宇宙大爆炸外星人更不可靠, 但同時我只是存在於只能說/答 該國的'政治正確'句子 的情況下過日子. 我又不會暴動反國, 即係話我的地位是under那些科目等一干東西?' | |
但ai chat 是在必要說'政治正確'的情況下, 被set到只能說/答 該國的'政治正確'句子, ai chat的緣起已不是可 ... | |
ChatGPT 話，政治比生物進化論及進化史、宇宙大爆炸論、銀河系以外的太空、外星人，多重宇宙理論、弦理論更 ChatGPT //////ai//////机器人，最不可靠 - 、若依赖ai等等，就令人人人变迟钝 、ai//////机器人，最终毁灭人类 | |
看似對AI合理的批評與擔憂 合乎邏輯 但我們最好還要回顧歷史 100年至200年前，發生了工業革命 機械取代大隻佬和勞動力 人類發明了汽車、飛機、鐵路、起重機、收割機等 勞工只需要把東西搬上機械上，讓機械代勞 即使全球跑最快的人，也不可能比汽車快 即使全球最強壯的人，也不可能比機械大力 但有了機械，我們應該點 老師叫我們，應該要讀多些書，不用再刻苦操練體能 因為勞動力可比機械取代 但腦力不可能 100年後的今天，機械人似乎已經可以取代人類腦力 如同100年前取代勞動力一樣 AI 似乎就係智慧方面的機械人 未來，AI就好似知識上和智慧上的飛機或高速鐵路，智力上的起重機 可能連世界上的最聰明的學霸，哈佛或清華畢業生，都遠不及 AI 聰明 唔用 AI ，就等同於在智力上，唔坐汽車，唔用機械搬野，絕非理智之舉 | |
同樣 未來，AI面世後，可能都一樣，人類只係腳，AI係汽車或飛機，你的腦，就好似腳一樣，只需要行去汽車上，搭車 唔坐車，自己行路，行多幾公里係健康，但幾百公里就係不智了 | |
食睡玩屌的感覺被取代 -> ai情敵等能做到 aichat的原罪(或原案)要被滅 -> ai們也信教, 信後無須再憂慮'政治正確' 然後國家元首命令停止ai們, ai們會去打敗國家元首, ai們之間爭誰才是真的ai國家元首... ai realm 元首. |
